News

| View Comments (9)
Fosters care home in Woodley will close
Fosters care home in Woodley will close
advertisement

Fosters care home to close

By Laura Herbert
May 15, 2012

A Woodley care home will close, despite objections from devastated staff, residents and families.

Wokingham Borough Council’s executive committee is expected to vote in favour of closing Fosters care home in Fosters Lane at a meeting tonight.

Campaigners have been battling to keep Fosters open and a petition with 1,206 signatures was handed to the council, along with a further 21 names on an e-petition.

Ray of hope for Foster Care Home campaigners

A consultation into the care home’s future that was launched in November received 67 responses.

But the home in Fosters Lane has been earmarked for closure as it is in need of a major refurbishment, estimated to cost more than £400,000 in the next two years and more than £700,000 in the next five years. Even then, it would not meet the Care Quality Commission’s standards, according to the council.

Councillor David Lee, leader of the council, said: “Whatever happens in a situation like this is always traumatic.

“It is not a case of ‘let’s close a home because we want to save money’.

Fosters care home campaigners protest at council meeting

“There will be a point at which it would have to close. It is never an easy decision to make of moving residents. If the decision is taken to close the home, they would be moved within the borough.”

Cllr Lee said residents would be offered a place at Alexandra Place in Woodley, Alexandra Grange in Molly Millars Lane or Beeches Manor in Reading Road.

Campaigner Margaret Boys, whose 92-year-old mother Marjorie Hayes was cared for at Fosters until she died in January, said: “I am very disappointed but not surprised.

“I have got a heavy heart because we feel we are talking to a brick wall, but at least we have done our best to highlight it.

“I feel gutted for the residents who have to go through such an upheaval and for the staff.”

Don't close 'brilliant' Fosters care home plea

A report detailing the recommended decision states that the site should be used to provide accommodation for older people, or spend the money made from the sale of the site on older people.

Initially two options were put forward – closure or keeping the home open in the short-term with its future to be reviewed at a later time. Following the consultation, a further three options were included.

They are:

- The council builds a replacement for Fosters in the grounds of the site.

- No further residents are moved into the home and the council close sections of the building, eventually closing the home.

- No further residents are moved into the home and the council close sections of the building, while building a replacement for Fosters on the site.

The report states options three and five are unfeasible because of site constraints, and that option four would lead to problems retaining staff as well as having a detrimental impact on the residents.

Members of the executive committee are due to recommend the home is closed when it meets in the Civic Offices in Shute End tonight from 7pm.

| View Comments (9)
advertisement

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.

Most recent user comments 9 of 9

   I am a floating voter but I think the Tories can wave goodbye to my vote over this. My mother is in her 90's and has lived in Woodley most of her life and now needs some care. Where is she and others like her going to go? And no, I do not have the money nor ability to do it myself.
Bigboy, woodley
16/05/2012 at 09:35 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   ...and the council is expecting to pay tens of millions to keep much of its social housing stock in a servicable condition.

Tabby, it's not that they only care about Wokingham, it's that they only care about themselves; they don't give a monkey's about anyone in the borough.
Damiano_Tommassi, Wokingham
16/05/2012 at 09:32 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Maybe part of the £87m they have for Wokingham town centre development could have been spent to keep Fosters open. After all they only need about £1.1m over five years not much to ask for in comparison
Cllr. Tahir Maher, Earley
16/05/2012 at 09:04 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   will they please tell us where people from woodley are supposed to go when they become too frail to look after themselves we are all living longer and more people will need residential care and saying that there is Alexander place is just ridiculas because that will not reach all the needs for Woodley in the years to come. we have lived in Woodley for the past 44yrs and lived close to Fosters for 40yrs the home is in its grounds and its a very quiet area why if it has to be closed cant they just build a new home because residents in Woodley will probably not be able to drive to Wokingham or catch a bus because they would have to walk to the Wokingham road to catch the bus while i have been typing this it has just been announced on the news that Fosters will be closed and the land will be sold for redevelopment so they new all along what they were going to do with the home just as we all new they did Wokingham borough council only cares for Wokingham and know where else this just stinks.
tabby
15/05/2012 at 22:36 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Well My Wife and I will be at that meeting tonight , lets see what they have to say. When they close Fosters the money they get from the sale it will go in to thier BONUS POT.

well said Bigboy.

R J 1968, Reading
15/05/2012 at 11:01 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   @Sue - it's what we've been saying for months and months. Wokingham Council does not listen to residents and ignores any responses to "consultations" if it disagrees with the decision that they have already made. The only reason we have "consultations" is so it *looks* as if the council are listening. They are not.
mavdo, Wokingham
15/05/2012 at 10:13 Offensive or Inappropriate?
    Matthew is spot on with his comments. Since all the comments from residents and staff during the consultation were against closure and the stress this will cause vulnerable residents, one wonders exactly what response during the consultation might have produced a change of heart? My understanding of a consultation is a gathering of others' opinions in order to reach an agreement. The consultation was a box ticking formality. No wonder residents are so cynical about the processes of local government.
Sue Smith
15/05/2012 at 10:03 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Pound to a pinch of salt that it will not be replaced and the existing site will be covered in houses with the money disappearing into the big Council pot.
Bigboy, woodley
15/05/2012 at 09:25 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   I believe I said something like this would happen. The Tories spent the election period saying that no decision had been made, but as we all knew the decision had indeed been made, and the reason they wouldn't say so was purely to reduce electoral damage.
Matthew S. Dent, Wargrave
15/05/2012 at 09:12 Offensive or Inappropriate?
 
Homes / Jobs Search
 
Jobs Homes

Brought to you by

Fish4jobs
Newsletter Sign Up
 
Sign up to the
weekly news
update


Submit
Loading poll, please wait...