
Reading FC chairman Sir John Madejski
advertisement
Madejski: Championship more exciting than Premier League
By Jonny FordhamJune 01, 2011
Sir John Madejski has attempted to console disappointed Reading fans by insisting that the Championship is more exciting than the Premier League.
Royals’ chairman also declared that, even if Monday’s £90million play-off final had not ended in defeat, the club would have struggled in the top flight without additional investment.
“The Championship is not a bad place to be,” said the multi-millionaire entrepreneur after Reading had lost 4-2 to Swansea City at Wembley.
“We know who is going to win the Premier League. We don’t know who is going to win the Championship.
“The Championship is a much more exciting place to be.
"Had we gone up, unless I can find my benevolent billionaire, which is unlikely, we would have just been an ‘also-ran’.”
Follow Jonny Fordham on Twitter here for all the Royals news as it breaks
Brian McDermott got the best out of his players this season, despite selling highly rated Gylfi Sigurdsson for a club-record £7m to Hoffenheim in August.
And Royals' boss may have to shuffle his pack on the cheap again.
Ivar Ingimarsson, Brynjar Gunnarson and David Mooney are likely to be released in the close season, while Burnley are interested in signing keeper Mikkel Andersen and Portsmouth and Southampton are keen on midfielder Brian Howard.

Browse Sections



Most recent user comments 12 of 12
I have often wondered why no one seems to want a well run club with all the facilities that we have, stadium, proximity to London, academy etc... -- The answer is the price - When in the Prem the club was reportably valued at around £105m - clearly deducting the £40m plus in Prem revenue reduces the clubs worth. BUT when you can buy a club for peanuts as long as you service the debt (in most cases this is largely written off - Portsmouth, Cardiff, Swansea and the list goes on) why would spend £60m plus on Reading? Would we as Reading Fans really want some dubious owner to finance to the purchase of "Our" club using debt (Man Utd) -- Some would say "hell yes" if it meant Premier League - But I will stay in the no camp thanks.
02/06/2011 at 17:18 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
I think adding another yes-man to RFC's boardroom could mean less wages for players given Madejski's style in running club affairs. Although it would be good having somebody who could make owning the club sound more appealing. Madejski makes it sound a sentence.
Joking aside though, unless its pure rumour, I have heard there are certain stipulations that have put potential buyers off. The price alone is apparently something close to how much was being quoted for Newcastle when Mike Ashley wanted to sell a couple of years ago. I mean Newcastle? A club whose already modernised ground capacity is double ours and many think needs increasing as its nearly filled each game. A fan base within the City itself which borders religion, before you even look at fans outside the city to which there are many. A reputation and name that's already known across Europe and a fairly long successful history that could easily be exploited for financial gain.
As a club and sadly even coming from a Loyal Royal, they're miles ahead as a more attractive investment. I have heard also that renaming or branding the stadium is prohibited. Rather than a club that would need creases ironed out or investment or debt to be written off to make it successful, seen in some recent takeovers. Reading FC looks a club where a potential owner's hands could be tied before they even get started and a club that could be requiring a lot of investment to begin getting a maximum return.
Selling players to balance the books is one thing. But selling players maybe before they've reached their full potential and done so for a couple of years at a potential cost of our own progression is foolish. Especially when compared to other clubs, Reading's debt isn't so huge in comparison. Sadly the likes of Long and Doyle before him will want to go play at higher levels and could fetch a good price, but why does the club continually do this?
Reading FC seems to always be selling it's assets and barely complimenting the ones it already has to add to a new season after a failed promotion bid?! We got good money for Gylfi granted, but in selling him you only have to look at results to see it only improved once Leigertwood was signed. Money agined, but wages can't of decreased. Reading should try to retain Long, Kebe, Mills etc like what was done in 2008/09 and yes clear out the chaff in the squad and bring in better players to improve the areas we'd been lacking. If it fails to work again, then yes sell. It seems to work at Cardiff in a way.
But I can't help but feel in the long run, through doing this Madejski's limited his own chances to ever selling the club. I believe his asset stripping has cost both himself and the club from receiving greater investment, which in the long run is the greater profit.
02/06/2011 at 15:25 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
If JM really can't sell then perhaps he should employ someone to do the job for him.
02/06/2011 at 13:25 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Just the same as after a cup run...Mickey Mouse cup etc etc.
Everybody wants to win, but some of us try and look at the brightside after a defeat like this.
There were thousands of us saying the same thing in the pub after the game.
02/06/2011 at 10:37 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
If SJM's comment was said wrt competitiveness, then I'd agree. But did he mean this?
01/06/2011 at 23:22 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
01/06/2011 at 19:23 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
01/06/2011 at 17:52 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
01/06/2011 at 17:49 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
01/06/2011 at 15:07 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
I'm no Madejski fan and I saw this interview on TV. Made in the heat of the moment in the tunnel after the game, but in all honesty fair play and nice try with what was said. Rarely do I, but I agree with his sentiments completely. The Premiership really is a league of leagues in itself, more so since we left it.
He has however failed to mention the rather nice pay day he will get from Monday's match. Traditionally the runners up take home the gate money. Of course it's not £90M but it's surely at least nearly 5 times a complete sell-out of the Mad Stad. I'm sure that will cover something given the tickets in most cases were almost treble his prices.
I don't want to bore the bloggers with a long rant about Madejski as we could be here till the next season starts. But I do wish he'd stop trying to mention within 30seconds of every interview these days, that he wants to sell the club and it almost appears as a great weight around his neck.
We've known since Reading's first season on the Premiership that he's wanted to sell, but the way he laments on about it almost makes owning Reading FC sound an awful task. How will that attract any potential buyer?! If after four years your still waiting Sir John have a look at what your offering or asking for it!
I admire his integrity to sell to the right people and if that turns out so, then his legacy will be looked back-on favourably by all I'm sure. But the rumoured price I've heard for our beloved club is unrealistic. How can moaning about still owning and wanting to sell a progressive football club, coupled with a high asking price attract richer business high-flyers who share a similar ethos of shrewdly buying a new project?
01/06/2011 at 14:17 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
01/06/2011 at 10:51 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
01/06/2011 at 09:17 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.