
Around 200 homes in the Reading area woke up this morning to find they had no water or low water pressure following a burst water main
advertisement
Reading water supply should be restored this afternoon
February 04, 2013
Around 700 homes in the Reading area woke up this morning to find they had no water or low water pressure following a burst water main.
Thames Water spokesman Simon Evans explained: "A large pipe, which takes treated water from Reading's main water works to Earley storage reservoir, burst early this morning.
"At 8am we had received 200 reports from customers in the RG2 and RG7 postal areas with either no water or low pressure.
“Water supplies are set to be restored in the next few hours to most of the customers in and around south Reading whose supplies were interrupted by a burst main early this morning.
“We have turned off water running through the broken pipe and we are now re-routing water to the affected areas from other parts of the network.
“Water pressure is now starting to build back up in the network and by mid afternoon normal service should have been restored to most affected customers in the RG2 and RG7 postal areas.
“Meanwhile our engineers are digging out the broken section of pipe to replace it.
“The main, which takes treated water from Reading's main water works to Earley storage reservoir, burst at 4.30am.
“By 10am we had received 900 reports from customers in the RG2 and RG7 postal areas with either no water or low pressure.
“We are sorry to everyone affected by this.”
Christ The King RC Primary School, Whitley Park School, and South Reading Youth and Community Centre and nursery have been closed because of the leak.

Browse Sections



Most recent user comments 15 of 32
I do appreciate there are people that are affected by lack of water than others (and admit I was blinkered to that fact yesterday).
Failing any decent response following my complaint I'd go higher until I received a satisfactory response and the level of service I should receive.
05/02/2013 at 10:00 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Prat, F U 'elp!
05/02/2013 at 09:24 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
04/02/2013 at 23:05 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Quite a few, but one that caught my eye was 'A Cubicle Donor Roughing.'
Sit down, Tony.
04/02/2013 at 18:50 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
There are ways around this problem but the main issue is the lack of support from Thames Water themselves. Its all good using contractors to do work but I must have seen around 50 people asking the contractors what was going on and they didn't know what to tell people.
04/02/2013 at 17:02 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
If your disabled and water is disconnected simplly Rink the hotline number on the van's and POLITLY explain the situation and ask Thames to deliver some bottles, or ask the Thames water rep that may be in attendance at times with the Contractors..NOTE Thames rep not contractors
04/02/2013 at 16:14 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
The problem reported here is a completly different one to what ever happened Sunday This was a broken main early this morning..I know this for a fact Yesterday ( Sunday ) was something PN Daly was responsable for Yes I know a contractor used by Thames so in respect Thames bear some fault,
And Thames do keep records of Home Dialysis people and ensure water is maintained where possible ..Fact...
04/02/2013 at 16:08 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
The problem isn't with Thames water causing a problem it's with their response. Shelling out free water from Spencer House TODAY is a bit late for the people that needed it all day yesterday and the fact a lot of people couldn't get there doesn't help either. The point I was trying to make, which you missed entirely, is that we pay Thames Water to provide a service which they clearly don't provide. This service includes informing people when there is a problem and how long it will go on for - and to supply water to areas that are in need of it in the event of an 'infrastructure failure'. All comments and article notes imply that this was RG2 and RG7 areas when clearly this was a larger issue than that as I am RG1 and they were also digging up Kendrick Road and pumping away LOTS of water there too - all night. Guessing you're the sort of person that's happy to pay for a mobile phone that has no reception most of the time and no customer service (or similar anyway) ?
Bahumbug... totally agree - "Perhaps in this day of money comes first and service somewhat later to those fit and able or in the right cryteria of the human population this is right."
04/02/2013 at 15:56 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
04/02/2013 at 15:10 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
04/02/2013 at 15:00 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
I repeat - not even a full day without water.
So how would you predict what pipe is going to burst next? How do you expect Thames Water to? Pipes will burst, fact.
They've addressed the situation in half a day. That to me isn't an example of not being able to organise a p155-up in a brewery.
And personally, I don't feel ripped off for the price I pay for clean running water.
Your username would suggest you're just disgruntled in general. There's a solution if you're disgruntled in general about being a Reading resident.....
(P.S I'll stay on my soapbox for now thanks, and disabled or not, we all need water and are inconvenienced the same for the very rare occassions we are without water, (just how many days a year are you without water?). Maybe it's you who needs to see this for what it is).
04/02/2013 at 14:24 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
04/02/2013 at 14:19 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
04/02/2013 at 14:14 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
04/02/2013 at 14:02 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Agreed that we should be thankful but there's a difference between being thankful for what we have and being ripped off by a utility company that clearly cannot organise a p155 up in a brewery. Get off your soap box and see this as what it is.. it's not about people not having a water supply it's about lack of service and the inconvienience to those of us who are disabled - which we appear to be paying more for year on year and recieving less service.
04/02/2013 at 14:00 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.