
advertisement
Have your say on bin bag service
By Laura HerbertSeptember 04, 2012
Households are being urged to have their say on how the borough’s controversial new waste and recycling service is working.
The scheme, which came into force in April, was initially criticised as many households were given the wrong size blue bin bags and many felt they were too flimsy.
Families were also upset about the 80 bag limit forced on them by the council.
The consultation, which launched on Tuesday, August 21, aims to find out whether users think the service is running as intended.
Councillor Angus Ross, executive member for environment at Wokingham Borough Council, said: “It would be fair to say that we had a few initial problems when we launched the new service.
“Four months in, I am pleased to report good progress is being made.
“The amount of household waste sent for disposal has reduced by 21 per cent compared with the same period last year and recycling has increased by 32 per cent over the same period and this is all down to the efforts of our residents.
“This means we are on track to meet our budget target of saving nearly a million pounds in the first year, but just as importantly, we are avoiding landfill penalties and contributing to the environment by sending more for recycling.”
Cllr Ross added: “Our citizen’s panel have received copies of the survey along with members of the public who raised concerns with us over the past four months, but we want to hear from as many local residents as possible.
“This new service affected everyone and we are keen to learn more about their experiences and how the scheme is working.”
The survey asks about the blue waste sacks, including suitability, kerbside recycling scheme, the recycling rewards scheme and the opt-in garden waste scheme.
Visit www.wokingham.gov.uk/council/consultations/wasteservices to complete the survey by Friday, September 14.
The results will be reported to the executive later this year and will help improve the service next year.

Browse Sections



Most recent user comments 15 of 34
05/09/2012 at 13:58 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
It's not a 77k annual cost though, is it - it says '77k rising to 144k'....
05/09/2012 at 13:49 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
05/09/2012 at 13:46 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
05/09/2012 at 12:54 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
'One of the first costs is a subscription to RecycleBank to operate the rewards system on their behalf, this can be done in either a ‘flat-rate' of an annual subscription or it can be calculated on landfill diversion.'
'One of the main costs for the council in adopting the scheme would be in paying RecycleBank itself to administer the scheme, with Windsor and Maidenhead currently paying a flat rate of £77,000 to RecycleBank for 2010/11, rising to £144,000 over the course of 2011/12. Halton also pays a flat rate for the scheme, although the exact costs have not been divulged.'
£77K = 1283 Green waste bins for a year.
05/09/2012 at 12:39 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Great quote to find from Gary Cowan. Certainly suggests that whoever won the contract (Veolia in this case) had to run an incentive scheme either by themselves or through a partnership similar to Maidenheads.
05/09/2012 at 10:44 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
'Councillor Gary Cown, ........ added that the incentive scheme costs were built into the contract, revealing: “we put a condition in the tender saying that we expected them to deliver some form of incentive scheme.”'
Source: http://www.letsrecycle.com/news/latest-news/councils/recyclebank-scheme-to-be-introduced-in-wokingham
So, I believe there are costs..... not to mention the lost revenue from those traders opting into the scheme. How much has the Carnival Pool lost out by accepting 'Free Child' swimming vouchers at £3.10 a time?
05/09/2012 at 10:29 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Recyclebank is an external company that started in America. It is seperate to the council and they are not paying them for it. Recyclebank get offers from companies for discounts to run on their site and also your personal details so I am sure most of their revenue would be ad based. The fact you also have to call them each week would bring in some as well I would guess
05/09/2012 at 10:18 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
As for the garden waste, now that I do have a problem with. Why not continue the green bags? It was easy to use. I have seen so many people dumping their garden waste around the South Lake area and in High Wood it is a disgrace. I myself take it to the tip but I am lucky and have a car, what about the older people?
A little more thought I think WDC but I am speaking from Woodley and we seem to be the 'poor relation' to WDC - again. To be honest WDC just takes our money and does very little for Woodley.
05/09/2012 at 10:16 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
When a change to a service affects all 60,000+ properties in the Borough it's not going to be popular with everyone. Particularly if you could get rid of as much waste pre April 2012 without a care to where it went and no need to recycle. Where as now it is being controlled you do have to care about how much rubbish you produce. Not many people are going to welcome this new scheme with open arms.
Woky Local - Sorry to disappoint but I beleive Recyclebank is free to WBC and its users. It's already come up before on here that Recyclebank make their money through advertising on the website and probably selling on data to marketing companies. I look forward to seeing the results of your FOI on here in 20 working days as I'm not sure if anyone has the 'offcial' answer. Maybe you could kill 2 birds with one stone and ask about the tonnage of waste received so far compared to last year. It might save Damiano Tommassi some time?
Phil - Can you take your petty and personal spat against Keith Baker somewhere else and bore off?
05/09/2012 at 10:14 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
05/09/2012 at 10:01 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
05/09/2012 at 09:52 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
05/09/2012 at 09:14 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
04/09/2012 at 20:22 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
04/09/2012 at 16:57 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.