
Waste from a ripped blue bag scattered outside a home in Crowthorne
advertisement
No blue bin bags, no rubbish collection
By Laura HerbertMay 23, 2012
People in Wokingham not using blue bin bags under the borough’s new waste scheme will no longer have their rubbish collected.
In the next few weeks, Wokingham Borough Council will begin policing the scheme and households failing to use the bags will be left off rounds.
The launch of the scheme six weeks ago was plagued by a number of incorrectly sized bags being issued to residents but the council will now begin to crack down on homes failing to use the bags.
Pete Baveystock, chief officer for waste and recycling, said: “The changes have bedded in now. We will be working with residents to create a ‘light touch’ to get them all using the blue bags.
“We are not looking at penalties, we are looking at working with residents as there is no reason why they shouldn’t be using the blue bags. It’s an educational process.”
Issues about the strength of the bags continue to be raised, with many people claiming they are too weak and, as they must be left out by 6.30am for collection, animals are easily ripping into bags.
Mr Baveystock said: “If animals are getting to the bag and you have to put it out overnight, put it in a dustbin. The bags are 25 micron*, above what you would get in the supermarket.”
Since Veolia Environmental Services took over the tender of the service, recycling in the borough has increased by 30 per cent and household waste reduced by 25 per cent.
Councillor Gary Cowan, outgoing executive member for environment, said: “This is down to our residents’ efforts and we hope to be able to sustain this good work throughout the year.
“The new scheme will allow us to achieve even more and save nearly a million pounds every year which can be pumped back into vital front line services.
“We know things didn’t go as smoothly as we hoped in April, and there are still a number of residents who have outstanding issues with us, but we are working hard to address these as quickly as we can. I’d like to thank you for your patience.”
Cllr Cowan added: “We appreciate the new waste scheme has been a big change for our residents but it was a change we had to make as landfill taxes of £64 per tonne are increasing at £8 per tonne year on year.
“We’ve been set targets to reduce landfill by a third before 2020, and if we don’t achieve this, we face significant penalties of £150 per tonne that would take vital money away from front line services.
“We are extremely pleased with the results for April but know we still have a long way to go to deliver on all of our targets.”
Jack Lavington, municipal south regional director at Veolia Environmental Services, added: “Seeing a 30 per cent rise in recycling in such a short space of time is an outstanding result but we believe even further progress can be made and look forward to working with residents to make this possible.”
Almost 6,000 homes have opted to pay for a brown wheelie bin, which is significantly fewer than the council’s initial estimate of 20,000 bins, while 3,500 properties are using compostable sacks.
Some people have been unable to order brown bins because of problems with telephones but the council says it is working to resolve the issue with Veolia. Anyone wanting to join the scheme can call (0118) 909 9360 to place an order.
* The thickness of bags are measured in microns, which is short for micromillimetre. Bags with a higher micron have thicker polythene therefore the bag will be stronger.

Browse Sections



Most recent user comments 15 of 36
29/05/2012 at 00:09 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
25/05/2012 at 11:50 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
25/05/2012 at 09:50 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
25/05/2012 at 09:39 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
IP Freely says that things need to improve significantly next year - well, we have quite a few weeks (months!) to go this year when we could do with some improvement! - whats going to happen next Jan/Feb/Mar when young families start to run out of bags?
24/05/2012 at 17:45 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
24/05/2012 at 13:32 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
24/05/2012 at 12:37 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
“What's the difference between suppling 80 bags a year or supplying a wheeled bin on a fornightly collection? If I lived in Reading or Maidenhead and I filled my wheeled bin and had extra waste, would I not have to pay to have it removed? I think the answer would be yes.” – I’m sorry, I don’t understand your point here; the immediately obvious differences are 1) foxes can’t rip a wheelie-bin apart and 2) the council wouldn’t monopolise the supply of its own preferred bags, which is an unnecessary cost and inconvenience both to them and the end user.
“My personal opinion is that if it was 'illeagal' then surely it would've been challenged by now?“ – absolutely agree. I’m surprised that no opposition party member has taken this to the courts, parliament or wherever is most appropriate. Or at least researched the matter fully and fed-back to us. Lot of party-political gain to be had there!
“I still think it will be interesting to see if any lessons have been learnt and what if anything will change for next April?” – yes indeed. I suspect nothing will change – I’ll have a fiver on it with you, if you like! – but time will tell.
Smiffy making perfect sense – “weekly recycling must be expensive and is unneccessary as all it means is that instead of putting two boxes out fortnightly, I now put out a box a week.” You can't argue with that logic.
24/05/2012 at 11:37 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
I don't think WBC have implemented an illegal scheme - I just think it is poorly thought through and implemented. It is also solely focussed on saving money and any environmental or resident implications are secondary. I say that, but weekly recycling must be expensive and is unneccessary as all it means is that instead of putting two boxes out fortnightly, I now put out a box a week. I don't recycle any more, because I have always recycled all I can, so essentially it is costing the council more to collect my recycling and I now have to get rid of my own green waste. Pathetic is the only word that describes the new scheme.
24/05/2012 at 09:55 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
What's the difference between suppling 80 bags a year or supplying a wheeled bin on a fornightly collection? If I lived in Reading or Maidenhead and I filled my wheeled bin and had extra waste, would I not have to pay to have it removed? I think the answer would be yes.
My personal opinion is that if it was 'illeagal' then surely it would've been challenged by now? The Lib Dems didn't question its legality as far as I am aware but I am happy to be corrected, Matthew Dent (Labour) has loosely called it "possibly illegal". I believe Matthew also wrote a letter to Grant Shapps MP(which I think is great BTW, trying to seek some clarity on the matter) only to receive a response from DEFRA - Grant Shapps MP obviously just passed it on, "Fobbed off". These responses to me suggest some would like it to be illegal but there is a likelihood it is not.
I still think it will be interesting to see if any lessons have been learnt and what if anything will change for next April?
24/05/2012 at 09:31 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
23/05/2012 at 17:44 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
23/05/2012 at 17:22 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Section (3) In making requirements under subsection (1) above the authority may, as respects the provision of the receptacles— (a)determine that they be provided by the authority free of charge; (b)propose that they be provided, if the occupier agrees, by the authority on payment by him of such a single payment or such periodical payments as he agrees with the authority; (c)require the occupier to provide them if he does not enter into an agreement under paragraph (b) above within a specified period; or (d)require the occupier to provide them.
WBC say that they can charge under Section (3) (b) but that requires the occupier to agree, otherwise Section (3) (d) says you can supply your own...
Then who is going to risk taking WBC to court with their almost infinite resources vs. limited personal resources...
23/05/2012 at 17:17 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
23/05/2012 at 16:51 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
That surprises me, I've been leaving my blue bag inside a black plastic dustbin with no problems. Heavy bags too, full of nappies, still they take them.
23/05/2012 at 16:33 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.