
advertisement
Woodley woman sentenced for benefit fraud
August 01, 2011
A 47-year-old Woodley woman has been prosecuted for committing benefit fraud worth more than £5,000.
Julie Brown, of Howth Drive, Woodley, was given a 12-month community sentence with a requirement of 80 hours of unpaid work after admitting fraud totalling £5,159.
She was also ordered to pay £100 costs after appearing at Reading Magistrates' Court on Wednesday, July 6.
Brown admitted making a false statement and not declaring she was living with her employed partner after an investigation.
Muir Laurie, director of business assurance and democratic services at Wokingham Borough Council, said: “This was another excellent result that highlights the benefits of joint working between the local councils and the Department of Work and Pensions, all of whom are committed to identifying fraudulent benefit claims and pooling resources to protect the public purse.”
Anyone with concerns relating to benefit fraud can report them in confidence on 0800 454 240.

Browse Sections



Most recent user comments 13 of 13
04/08/2011 at 22:08 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
03/08/2011 at 15:45 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
02/08/2011 at 21:31 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
01/08/2011 at 22:45 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Your ego must certainly take a hit.
01/08/2011 at 20:30 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
I just cannot believe ill-educated people that blindly bow to bureaucracy are recruited to work for the government civil service.
01/08/2011 at 17:10 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
01/08/2011 at 17:04 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
01/08/2011 at 17:00 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
01/08/2011 at 15:50 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Agree with whitespirit that there is a lot of corporate tax being squirreled away, but there also appears to be a lot of benefit fraud going one and it probably totals as much as the corporate tax evasion, so it is good that offenders are brought to justice.
Thomas, the DWP isn't there to pay for your holiday, so it doesn't seem unreasonable to halt a benefit for a holiday, as in that period you would not be job seeking. Whether it is liked or not, there has to be a process.
01/08/2011 at 15:36 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Or have I missed something?
01/08/2011 at 15:28 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
I am currently claiming benefits, and have experienced the Procrustean fascism of the DWP via Reading Jobcentre. What happened was that, for 1 week, I went on holiday to the Irish Republic. I was honest, informing the DWP, and the benefit was suspended, and I now have to, and here's a euphemism, undergo what is known as a Rapid Reclaim.
Anyway, I went to the DWP in Reading on Thursday last week - I stated that I was honest, and veracious, and that I needed my benefit. He said I had lost my benefits, as I went on holiday and was not actively seeking employment. Ire ensued. Anyway, his smug, condescending manner caused me to "assault him" albeit mildly, with phlegm touching his shirt. Four Group 4 security guards, one with a weird tattoo, used excessive force to restrain me, consequently. Now you wonder why people defraud the DWP. It is pointless being honest with them, as they crucify you for that.
01/08/2011 at 14:39 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Or possibly the tax affairs of certain large media companies with a penchant for hacking phones.
01/08/2011 at 14:21 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.