Jobs News

| Submit Comments | View Comments (69)
The new Tesco warehouse in Imperial Way will create 1,150 jobs with 85 of those being ring-fenced for local people who are long-term unemployed
The new Tesco warehouse in Imperial Way will create 1,150 jobs with 85 of those being ring-fenced for local people who are long-term unemployed
advertisement

Tesco distribution centre brings 1,000 jobs to Reading in May

By David Millward
February 26, 2013

Supermarket giant Tesco has confirmed it will be opening its new distribution centre in South Reading in May.

The 900,000 sq ft grocery warehouse in Imperial Way will create 1,150 jobs with 85 of those being ring-fenced for local people who are long-term unemployed.

There will be opportunities for drivers, mechanics, warehouse workers, maintenance staff and in management.

A statement issued by the company's media relations manager Lizzie Roberts said: "This is a significant investment in the local economy and will create hundreds of jobs for local people, including some specifically for the long term unemployed."

Tesco says customers will also benefit from improved availability of products in its stores in the Reading area.

| Submit Comments | View Comments (69)
advertisement

Add Your Comment

All comments posted here should abide by our Community Policy

Most recent user comments 15 of 69

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next Page Show 15 | 25 | 50 per page

   @Recycling,

It looks definitely that it's going to be the Maximus or A4E gravy train.

What Tesco are doing is deeply exploitative.
THOMAS CASAGRANDA
02/03/2013 at 09:45 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   they are advertizing for team members now on the tesco main depo site application on line to them before 1 april
recycling
02/03/2013 at 02:28 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   I worked at tescos main depo in southampton through tesco own agency we had 80 per cent polish for min wage 6.19. sat 770 sun 8 but they used to make every body do over time when hey regested which was neary every week they would say we need you because full time were off they would make people whow didnt know work every day plus over time i tried to get afull time job with them so did a lot other english who were top pickers but they declined i have seen new fulltime people work there how left they changed the pay rate to 870 per hour which the old full were on 960 hour and the new ones had to 100 per cent pick rate every hour which rhe old ones only had to get 85 per cent
recycling
02/03/2013 at 02:28 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Think most of the jobs went last year when they held open days...People who expressed interest then would be contacted when training ect starts.
A. XYZ
01/03/2013 at 13:22 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   When will the jobs be advertised
andygood
01/03/2013 at 11:04 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Small Tesco's are Express..then come Supermarket size ..ie Henley

24hr one's are Extra's ...as the name suggests they have extra range of stock choices.....
A. XYZ
27/02/2013 at 23:36 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   As both West Reading /portman rd store and Kings meadow are listed as Reading Extra I don't think there's a larger one in Reading...
A. XYZ
27/02/2013 at 23:32 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   @ A.XYZ,

There wasn't a moment of clarity with Strange Man's verbiage. I was unable to understand what he meant by "i work for tesco from 2004 on wards at both reading extras", but I have managed to decipher it as 'I work for tesco from 2004 onwards at both reading extras".

What I wish to know is whether he still works at Tesco, or whether he has finished his employ. If it were Tesco Extra, he wouldn't be able to see what happens in the larger stores, and the placements by the Work Programme.
THOMAS CASAGRANDA
27/02/2013 at 20:16 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   THOMAS CASAGRANDA

@bruce wayne, i work nights so 04:45 is a normal time of day for me @THOMAS CASAGRANDA with out giving away my identity i work for tesco from 2004 on wards at both reading extras

I read his reply to mean he still works for them..
A. XYZ
27/02/2013 at 20:07 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   @Strange Man,

So you haven't worked for them in 2012 or 2013, then ?
THOMAS CASAGRANDA
27/02/2013 at 19:43 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   @Amethyst,

Your second paragraph states "I can see that you are trying to discredit them further".

To "discredit" means "to harm the good reputation of", or "to refuse to believe". It stems from the Latin "credere" to "believe, or to trust".

Now: bearing in mind Emma Harrison, the Tsarina of A4E, has made millions from A4E, and has manipulated the figures on how many have been placed in A4E, then it would cause me to think that Emma Harrison, herself, has "discredited' her own company.

The figures for Maximus, the other work programme provider, and how many they have helped into work, show that only 2% have found long-term employment in Britain.

I, ergo, haven't "discredited' the work programme, as they have done a fine job on their own of doing so.

I would add that Sue Ryder "Charity shops" , and not the care homes, were the businesses that were using the back to work schemes. Boycotting the workfare, in this instance, was the right step to take, as the care homes were not, in any way, shape, or form, affected.

I would also add that Iain Duncan Smith has also discredited the work programme, and he has done so by throwing his toys out of the pram after Cait Reilly's victory this month. Such ill-tempered behaviour highlight a man who knows his days to be numbered.
THOMAS CASAGRANDA
27/02/2013 at 19:33 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   @THOMAS CASAGRANDA: I know that A4e have a bad reputation, I have already researched them. But I have no choice, I have to be on the work program, so I do not consider that there is much point dwelling on their past mistakes or what I have already signed up for. So far they have treated me well and they have been more use than the jobcentre were.

I can see that you are trying to discredit them further and Im sure people like you are having some success as I just read that Sue Ryder has now dropped out of back-to-work schemes due to online lobbying, so well done.
amethyst, Reading
27/02/2013 at 18:26 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   My apologies, Alf, for missing the word have between 'Tesco' and '85'. I should have proof read before submitting!!
janus, Tilehurst
27/02/2013 at 18:11 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   @bruce wayne, i work nights so 04:45 is a normal time of day for me @THOMAS CASAGRANDA with out giving away my identity i work for tesco from 2004 on wards at both reading extras
strange man, reading
27/02/2013 at 17:44 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   @Alf,

85 happens after Maximus / A4E and Tesco have mutually engaged in Ugandan discussions with the Work Programme people like Amethyst.

BTW: Ugandan Discussions, or Ugandan affairs is a Private Eye term, and, possibly, not in the Urban Dictionary.

@Amethyst: I really think you should consider how much the Work Programme will benefit from you, as part of a mark-up. I'd consider, closely, and re-read what you have signed with A4E. A4E have been known, just google them, to have made horrendous blunders, and to have corralled people into working for nothing. Again, I ask you to check out www.boycottworkfare.org. I'm not discouraging you, as your intentions are thoroughly commendable, Amethyst, but, for your own sake, take the time to consider what you are letting your self in for with the Work Programme. Please read Shiv Malik in The Guardian, Amethyst, and please also research Emma Harrison, the former head of A4E, and draw your conclusions from these points of reference and research.
THOMAS CASAGRANDA
27/02/2013 at 16:37 Offensive or Inappropriate?
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next Page Show 15 | 25 | 50 per page

 
Homes / Jobs Search
 
Jobs Homes

Brought to you by

Fish4jobs
Newsletter Sign Up
 
Sign up to the
weekly news
update


Submit
Loading poll, please wait...