Jobs News

| View Comments (13)

advertisement

Job cuts at The University of Reading

By Laura Herbert
March 15, 2010

Jobs are set to be axed at The University of Reading to cut costs and help it “emerge stronger and more competitive”.

The posts will go from subjects including computer science, electronics, cybernetics, biology, engineering and chemistry.

Recommendations so far are that environmental biology lose three to five positions, biomedical sciences two to four and chemistry two to four.

The job losses are part of the university’s plans to save £10.6 million after the Government announced a £1 billion cut to Higher Education (HE) funding.

Alex Brannen, university spokesman, said: “As part of The University of Reading’s response to the major economic challenges facing HE, we have been working with our staff to save £10.6 million while ensuring the university emerges stronger and more competitive as a result.

“Research in science is a real strength of our university and we are determined the savings needed will not undermine this.”

“We are conducting great research in climate science, food and nutritional science and neurology, for example, and also in some areas of systems engineering – we want to protect them.”

Mr Brannen said the university had begun making savings in systems engineering, with recommendations that six to 12 academic staff posts and five to 10 support staff are cut.

He said: “The Review of the School of Systems Engineering, which performed disappointingly in the latest Research Assessment Exercise, but

which also boasts areas of individual and collective excellence, was based on our determination to provide a positive foundation on which to build a strong and reinvigorated School of Systems Engineering.”

He added: “We have also identified the need to make savings of between two and five posts in the areas of environmental biology, biomedical sciences and chemistry.

“The university strives to avoid compulsory redundancies wherever possible.

“Specific recommendations will be presented to the university’s Governing body, the Council, on Friday.”

Fewer posts are to be cut at Reading than other universities such as London Metropolitan where 550 posts will go and 700 posts at Leeds.

But the University and College Union (UCU) criticised the move.

UCU Reading branch president Tim Astin said: “Even by management’s own standards these decisions are rash and will come back to haunt the university. The vice-chancellor has failed to make a coherent academic case for taking a wrecking ball to the sciences.

“This is another huge blow for staff and students. It seems no subject is safe at Reading.”

The university is not closing departments but will spend money in its strongest areas. Not all savings are staff posts and will be made across the university.

| View Comments (13)
advertisement

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.

Most recent user comments 13 of 13

   OK Gilbert, just read your piece. I was near the mark; you are spot on.
AndyMan, Reading
20/03/2010 at 19:51 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   AndyMan,

Your analysis is close but not quite on the mark. Yes the University has sold land to pay for the development of a new Institute of Education (EPs passim) but the real payback is when they sell the Bulmershe site which the IoE is currently on. Along with the IoE at Bulmershe is the School of Health and Social Care. The IoE trains teacher's very well - no argument - but SO DID THE SCHOOL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE. One gets a new home on London Road, the other gets the bin (at least as far as UoR is concerned). Frankly I would not like to make a trade off between excellent teachers and excellent social worker. The truth is Reading town NEEDS BOTH.
Gilbert Bear
17/03/2010 at 20:24 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Buck: '...bring bang hanging...' Slip of the tongue? ;)
Victoria
15/03/2010 at 22:27 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Globbits, I'll explain. Gordon Brown and his merry men have taken away the 10.6 million from the funds which pay for staff, particularly teaching staff. Many don't like how this medecine is being administered. However, on the other hand the University has sold property to make 30 million in order to re-vitalise an outfit which trains, excellently, 1000 school teachers each year. Overall it seems like a good deal to me.
AndyMan, Reading
15/03/2010 at 21:22 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Seems a poor decision to cut jobs in Computer Science, Cybernetics and Electronic Engineering when we badly need these kind of graduates in the town to keep our high tech base healthy. The end result of this will be 1000s of jobs lost to overseas, where, incidentally, they are investing in Higher Education and not cutting it. Strikes me that following the closure of the School of Health and Social Care, they are making yet another decision which puts two fingers up to the town.
Gilbert Bear
15/03/2010 at 18:15 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   "we have been working with our staff to save £10.6 million"

how they hope to save £10.6m when they are going to spend £30m on new teacher training facilities is a mystery....
globbits
15/03/2010 at 16:56 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   This seems fair enough to me. It'll give the students a taste of the real world for when they graduate. Job cuts, governments cuts and all round misery. Bring bang hanging whilst we're at it.
Buck, Reading
15/03/2010 at 16:31 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   MC, yes a proposed reduction in permanent headcount of 73
Spanky
15/03/2010 at 16:12 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Have Yell announced more redundancies then Spanky? Haven't heard anything about that.

Makes you wonder where the country is heading with so many people being put out of their jobs.
Mountain Cat, Tilehurst
15/03/2010 at 15:52 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Back in the real world, Yell announce redundancies and it doesn't make the local news ....
Spanky
15/03/2010 at 15:28 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Get in the real world !!!
PH
15/03/2010 at 15:12 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   there 's so many people who work there and do nothing all day it's unreal, almost as bad as the council, it has been a long time coming.
rogerjolly, reading
15/03/2010 at 15:04 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   At this rate exactly what WILL be left in, say, 5 years from now?
One who knows, Chaversham
15/03/2010 at 13:48 Offensive or Inappropriate?
 
Homes / Jobs Search
 
Jobs Homes

Brought to you by

Fish4jobs
Newsletter Sign Up
 
Sign up to the
weekly news
update


Submit
Loading poll, please wait...