
Sir John Madejski with Marc Mogull, managing partner of Benson Elliot, and David Camp, chief executive officer of Stanhope plc
advertisement
Station Hill development bought out
By Alan BunceJanuary 13, 2011
Reading's Station Hill development has been given “renewed impetus” after Sir John Madejski sold his controlling share in the £400 million project to a joint venture partnership.
His firm, Sackville Properties, has sold a majority share of its subsidiary Sackville Developments (Reading), which owns the site, to a joint venture between property investment fund Benson Elliot Capital Management and developer Stanhope plc.
The new partners are now reassesing the scheme but vow it will get a new lease of life from their involvement. However, Benson Elliot estimated work will not begin for another three years. It has been previously mooted work was potentially on course for next year.
Sackville development director Jon Homan said: “Obviously the last couple of years have been difficult for everybody involved, not just in property but the economy generally so this will give the scheme renewed impetus.”
Mr Homan continued: “We are very excited by the joint venture (JV). It was always our intention to bring in a JV partner.
“What will happen now is there will be a total reassessment of the current scheme and the marketplace generally to formulate a detailed strategy for the best way forward. There may be some changes to the phasing and how it is delivered.
“There is always a long way between outline planning consent and detailed consent. Everybody is a little bit more aware of the need to be flexible with the design. The heady days of the property market of 2005/2006 have gone. There will be a more cautious approach in the timing and phasing.”
He added: “It is the aim of the partnership to work with the local authority and others to bring this forward and make it happen. That will be a credit to all involved.”
Sackville Properties bought the site in 2005 and won planning approval in 2007. But the plan was called in by the-then secretary of state for communities and local government, Hazel Blears. Sackville then bought Friars Walk and drew up plans for an extended scheme, gaining consent in September 2009.
The 3.25 acre project included office space, flats, shops, restaurants, a bowling alley and a public square.
Sir John said the deal was exciting for the “epicentre of Reading” and very significant people were now involved.
He said: “It’s marvellous news. It means the project goes forward which is what everybody wants. I don’t think it will change much.
“Time will tell but if it does change I am sure the change will be for the better.”
Mr Homan added the scheme was able to attract investment despite the difficult times because it was such a good location. He said: “Outside London I don’t think you will find a better site.”
Marc Mogull, managing partner at Benson Elliot and chairman of the UK Urban Land Institute, was behind the acquisition and redevelopment of Broad Street Mall in 2001 when he was with Doughty Hanson and said he had an existing relationship with the council.
He said: “When you have a vision for urban regeneration, this is a phenominal opportunity. It has all the stakeholder involvement.”
He expects it to be between two-and-a-half to three years before work will start but that, he said will be driven by the market.
“Station Hill will be on the doorstep of everyone who walks out of Reading station. This is the front room. It will be a shame if we cannot make a real effort to push forward,” he said.
He went on: “What we are pleased about is while we may, as time goes on, contemplate bringing in additional funding structures and additional capital, because of the nature of the joint venture, we have not just a significant operational capability but we have enormous amount of funding strength. That’s different from where the plan was a few years ago.”
But he said Sir John’s involvement was essential.
“We never contemplated a solution where Sackville and Sir John were not in a central role,” he said.
Stanhope director Charles Briscoe said the deal would bring fresh impetus and its timing would fit the expected economic recovery.
He said: “This site is extremely well placed to benefit from the recovery.
“Some of the demand will be growth driven but also relocations and there will be some through obselesence of business premises.”
Council leader Cllr Andrew Cumpsty said: “It is an important milestone in this critical development project for the town.”




Most recent user comments 15 of 22
13/01/2011 at 17:02 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
13/01/2011 at 15:14 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
13/01/2011 at 15:01 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
13/01/2011 at 14:54 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
13/01/2011 at 14:49 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
I cannot see under the circumstances that taxpayers should support/fund infrastructure that has been poorly conceived. I am also getting reports that RBC owned some of the land round the station; presumably the bus depot. Does anyone know if that is the case?
13/01/2011 at 13:40 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
13/01/2011 at 13:32 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Not having a go but they are not getting rid of bus passes- you just won’t be able to travel in the Morning peak- like most other parts of the country. One could argue that its right to cut this as its very much a local extra.
Another thing to take in to consideration is the extra time it will take busses to move about in the town centre as all this will add to congestion. So will Reading buses have to pay to put more buses on the road? As for friar street being two way- will be interesting how that works on a Friday and Saturday night Past all the pubs near Yates.
13/01/2011 at 12:51 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
13/01/2011 at 12:43 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
13/01/2011 at 12:06 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Who is funding this and importantly who is driving this push of Reading into the quagmire? There needs to be a full inquiry and a complete re-evaluation of the permissions granted. The Government immediately should stop the near £10 million transport funding recently announced for further infrastructure work which includes linking station hill with the station. These developers can afford to do it without taxpayers funds....and the Council should be insisting on it when pensioners are about to lose their bus passes and 300 RBC staff their jobs.
Nothing to smile about here. It's a sell out.
It is an old trick - get planning sell the plot; no-one saw it coming!
13/01/2011 at 11:58 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
13/01/2011 at 11:19 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
13/01/2011 at 11:18 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Quite agree. How on earth can we provide integrated transport with this scheme? If someone who doesn’t live locally comes in by train and wants to use the bus they will have a hell of a job. What amazes me is that the council owns the bus company and they still can’t do joined up thinking.
As for being negative- sorry not so. I’d be positive it was good scheme- it clearly isn’t. If an eye sore is replaced by a development that is not fit for purpose is one supposed to just say it’s a good idea? Ever thought it’s been let to get in this state for a reason? It’s one thing not to build a transport interchange, but quite another to shut station road as well!!! And the north entrance is no substitute. If station road stayed open the council wouldn’t have to waste all the money on rebuilding the town centre roads ( which the developer is not paying for?!)
13/01/2011 at 11:02 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
The decision to reassess the scheme is welcome if it will keep Station Hill open to public transport, which would be beneficial for the regeneration as it would keep buses and taxis close to it and the Station, rather than scattering them all across town which is the official position of the Council.
13/01/2011 at 10:26 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.